NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Rail Corporation New South Wales v Donald; Staff Innovations Pty Ltd t/as Bamford Family Trust [2018] NSWCA 82 Hearing dates: 3 and 4 October 2017 Decision date: 24 April 2018 Before: Beazley ACJ at [1]; McColl JA at [233]; Meagher JA at [234] Decision: (1) Appeal dismissed;
(2) The appellant to pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal;
(3) Cross-appeal dismissed;
(4) The second respondent to pay the first respondent's costs of the cross-appeal;
(5) No order as to costs as between the appellant and the second respondent on the appeal or the cross-appeal. Catchwords: TORTS – negligence – work injury – plaintiff/first respondent employed by second respondent labour hire company – first respondent's services hired out to appellant – breach of duty of care – injury sustained due to nature and conditions of employment – whether primary judge erred in drawing certain inferences regarding work undertaken by first respondent – whether primary judge erred in finding that first respondent would not have received adequate rest breaks – whether primary judge erred in finding that risk of harm was not insignificant – whether primary judge erred in finding that appellant and second respondent breached their respective duties of care to first respondent
TORTS – negligence – causation – whether primary judge erred in finding that first respondent sustained internal disc disruption which progressed to a disc protrusion where expert evidence was conflicting – whether primary judge erred in finding that appellant caused first respondent's internal disc disruption
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate