NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Brown v Goodbury [2018] NSWLEC 1199 Hearing dates: 9 April 2018 Date of orders: 26 April 2018 Decision date: 26 April 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 2 Before: Adam AC Decision: The application is dismissed. Catchwords: TREES: are all the trees part of a hedge – obstruction of views – obstruction not severe – effect of pruning on form and appearance of crepe myrtles Legislation Cited: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Amendment Bill 2010 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Haindl v Daisch [2011] NSWLEC 1145 Hough v Rettenmaier [2010] NSWLEC 1354 Johnson v Angus [2012] NSWLEC 192 Maynard v Mobbs [2011] NSWLEC 1416 McIntosh v Humphrey [2015] NSWLEC 1225 McKenzie v Selwood [2017] NSWLEC 1031 Salisbury v Harrison [2011] NSWLEC 1069 Tenacity Consulting v Warringah [2004] NSWLEC 140 Wisdom v Payn [2011] NSWLEC 1012 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Richard Robert Michael Brown (Applicant) Ian James Goodbury (First Respondent) Undine Desiree Goodbury (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Brown (Applicant)
Solicitors: Litigants in Person (Respondents) File Number(s): 2017/384639 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate