NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Patronis v State of New South Wales [2018] NSWSC 516 Hearing dates: 23, 26 April 2018 Decision date: 04 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Paragraphs 18 to 25 of the third amended statement of claim filed 1 December 2017 struck out with leave to re-plead; paragraphs 39 to 42 of the third amended statement of claim filed 1 December 2017 struck out; defendant's notice of motion filed 20 December 2017 otherwise dismissed; proceedings transferred to the District Court. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – pleadings – statement of claim pleading novel basis for invoking gaoler's duty of care – whether manifestly unarguable – admittedly inelegant pleadings – objections as to form of pleading – consideration of overriding purpose and object of proportionality – recognition that in pursuit of those objects breaches of the formal requirements of the rules whilst unfortunate must sometimes reluctantly be condoned Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 56, 60, 146 Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1944 (NSW), s 2 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 13.4(1), Part 14, 14.6, 14.7, 14.8, 14.28(1) Cases Cited: Cran v New South Wales (2004) 62 NSWLR 95; [2004] NSWCA 92 Garzo v Liverpool/Campbelltown Christian School Ltd [2011] NSWSC 292 Goldsmith v Sandilands (2002) 190 ALR 370; [2002] HCA 31 Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1988] 2 All ER 238; [1989] AC 53 Howard v Jarvis (1958) 98 CLR 177; [1958] HCA 19 Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd (2011) 243 CLR 361; [2011] HCA 11 Liao v State of New South Wales; Zhang v State of New South Wales [2014] NSWCA 71 New South Wales v Klein [2006] NSWCA 295 New South Wales v Tyszyk [2008] NSWCA 107 Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4 Sullivan v Moody (2001) 207 CLR 562; [2001] HCA 59 Tame v New South Wales; Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Ltd (2002) 211 CLR 317; [2002] HCA 35 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Vicky Patronis as Executrix of the estate of the late Dennis George Chris Patronis (plaintiff) State of New South Wales (defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Thompson (plaintiff) M Hutchings (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate