NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: XZ v R [2018] NSWCCA 76 Hearing dates: 7 March 2018 Date of orders: 30 April 2018 Decision date: 30 April 2018 Before: Payne JA at [1] Johnson J at [2] Campbell J at [79] Decision: Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – child sexual assault offences – sexual intercourse with a child under 10 years, then being a person under the authority of the Applicant, contrary to s.66A(2) Crimes Act 1900 – incite a child under 10 years to commit an act of indecency contrary to s.61O(2) Crimes Act 1900 – assault a child under the age of 16 years and at the time of the assault commit an act of indecency contrary to s.61M(2) Crimes Act 1900 – sexual intercourse with a child under 10 years contrary to 66A(1) Crimes Act 1900 – two victims of child sexual assault were the Applicant's step-granddaughters – additional Form 1 offences with respect to each victim - unrelated firearm offence – possess more than three unregistered firearms including at least one prohibited firearm contrary to s.51D(2) Firearms Act 1996 – aggregate sentence of imprisonment for 15 years and non-parole period of 10 years and six months – claim that sentence manifestly excessive – aggregate sentence reflected totality of Applicant's serious offending against two young victims over a period of time together with unrelated firearm offence – sentence not manifestly excessive – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Firearms Act 1996 Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 Cases Cited: Abbas v R (2013) 231 A Crim R 413; [2013] NSWCCA 115 Allen v R [2010] NSWCCA 47 DV v R [2017] NSWCCA 276 Essex v R [2013] NSWCCA 11 Ingham v R [2014] NSWCCA 123 Jones v R [2012] NSWCCA 262 KB v R [2015] NSWCCA 220 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 MLP v R [2014] NSWCCA 183 R v Achurch (2011) 216 A Crim R 152; [2011] NSWCCA 186 R v AZ (2011) 205 A Crim R 222; [2011] NSWCCA 43 R v Gavel (2014) 239 A Crim R 469; [2014] NSWCCA 56 R v Gommeson (2014) 243 A Crim R 534; [2014] NSWCCA 159 RJA v R (2008) 185 A Crim R 178; [2008] NSWCCA 89 R v Krstic [2005] NSWCCA 391 R v Lachlan (2015) 252 A Crim R 277; [2015] NSWCCA 178 Taylor v R [2018] NSWCCA 50 TO v R [2017] NSWCCA 12 Westaway v R [2016] NSWCCA 281 ZA v R [2017] NSWCCA 132 Category: Principal judgment Parties: XZ (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: Ms S Kluss (Applicant) Mr E Balodis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate