NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ingate v Andrews [2018] NSWCATAP 99 Hearing dates: 7 December 2017 Date of orders: 27 April 2018 Decision date: 27 April 2018 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: N Hennessy LCM, Deputy President D Goldstein, Senior Member Decision: (1) Appeal dismissed. (2) The parties are granted liberty to apply in connection with the costs of the appeal. Catchwords: HOME BUILDING – Builder's claim against owner for undocumented variations – Quantum Meruit – Relevant Principles – Application of Principles – Appeal Dismissed Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 52, s 60, s 80, Sch 4 cll 10(2), 12 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW), cl 38 Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Cases Cited: BBB Constructions v Aldi Foods [2010] NSWSC 1352 Brenner v First Artists' Management Pty Ltd [1993] VicRp 71; [1993] 2 VR 221 Charbel v Tanne [2010] NSWCTTT 453 Goodacre v Trinder Alpine Constructions Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCCT 124 Lumbers v W Cook Builders Pty Ltd [2008] HCA 27; 232 CLR 636 Nayak v Rockwall Constructions Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCATAP 18 Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul [1987] HCA 5; (1987) 162 CLR 221 Texts Cited: Macquarie Dictionary 3rd Ed Rev Spry ICF, The Principles of Equitable Remedies 9th Ed 2014 (Law Book Co, Sydney) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Stephen Ingate (First Appellant) Gabrielle Ingate (Second Appellant) Dixon John Andrews (Respondent) Representation: Self-represented (Appellants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate