NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Warwick (No.12) [2018] NSWSC 522 Hearing dates: 23 April 2018 Date of orders: 23 April 2018 Decision date: 30 April 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Garling J Decision: Set aside the subpoena addressed to the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Australia insofar as the Schedule contains paragraphs 2, 9, 15-17 (inclusive) and part of paragraph 21 Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – application to set aside subpoena issued to third party – whether subpoena amounted to discovery and was a fishing expedition – whether six paragraphs objected to had no legitimate forensic purpose – subpoena set aside in part Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Alister v The Queen [1984] HCA 45; (1984) 154 CLR 404 Attorney General for New South Wales v Chidgey [2008] NSWCCA 65 Attorney General for New South Wales v Stuart (1994) 34 NSWLR 667 Carroll v Attorney-General for NSW (1993) 70 A Crim R 162 Commissioner for Railways v Small (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 564 Perish v R [2015] NSWCCA 98 R v Saleam (1989) 16 NSWLR 14 R v Saleam [1999] NSWCCA 86 R v Warwick (No.2) [2017] NSWSC 1225 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: The Crown Leonard John Warwick (Accused) Representation: Counsel: K McKay / G Christofi (Crown) A R Conolly (Accused) R van Witsen (Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Australia)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate