NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: MWP Transport Pty Limited v Michael Thomas Kent [2018] NSWSC 524 Hearing dates: 20/04/2018 Date of orders: 20 April 2018 Decision date: 20 April 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: McDougall J Decision: Dismiss First Defendant's application for a stay. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – application for stay – concurrent civil and criminal proceedings – where plaintiffs in civil proceedings have not yet filed evidence – no prejudice to first defendant if evidence is permitted to be filed – prejudice to plaintiffs' if stay granted – application for stay premature – application dismissed. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Zhao (2015) 255 CLR 46 McMahon v Gould (1982) 7 ACLR 202 Niven v SS [2006] NSWCA 338 Reid v Howard (1995) 184 CLR 1 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: MWP Transport Pty Ltd (First Plaintiff) MWP Australia Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff) FRHP Holdings Pty Ltd (Third Plaintiff) Michael Thomas Kent (First Defendant) Christine Poynton-Kent (Second Defendant) Deduce Financials Pty Ltd (Third Defendant) Kent Investment Holdings Pty Ltd (Fourth Defendant) MCKRF Pty Ltd (Fifth Defendant) Deduce Superannuation Pty Ltd (Sixth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Hynes (Plaintiffs) K Madgwick (First, Third, Fourth and Sixth Defendants) I R Coleman SC (Second and Fifth Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate