NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Fu Tian Fortune Pty Ltd v Park Cho Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 528 Hearing dates: 5 & 6 March 2018 Date of orders: 30 April 2018 Decision date: 24 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Plaintiff not entitled to deposit. Defendant/cross- claimant entitled to damages in the agreed sum of $100,000. Summons dismissed. Order for costs made on the ordinary basis unless motion filed seeking some other order within 7 days. Catchwords: LAND LAW - Conveyancing - Contract for sale - defendant/vendor alleges contract novated from second plaintiff (the original purchaser) to first plaintiff (the alleged new purchaser) - novation contested by plaintiffs - Notice of Termination issued by vendor to the first plaintiff - whether termination effective - first plaintiff initially sought declaration that the contract for sale was on foot and specific performance claim for a declaration and specific performance later abandoned - plaintiffs seek return of deposit in the alternative - cross claim by vendor seeking to retain deposit - whether vendor entitled to retain deposit under Conveyancing Act 1919, s 55(2A). Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919, s 55(2A) Real Property Act 1900, s 42(1)(d) Retail Leases Act 1994, s 16 Cases Cited: A Jones & Son Pty Ltd v Weeden [1964 – 1965] NSWR 1780 Alcova Holdings Pty Limited v Pandarlo Pty Ltd (1988) 15 NSWLR 53 Eighth SRJ Pty Ltd v Merity (1997) 7 BPR 97,635 Fightvision Pty Ltd v Onisforou (1999) 47 NSWLR 473 Lucas & Tait (Investments) Pty Ltd v Victoria Securities Ltd [1973] 2 NSWLR 268 HG & R Securities Pty Limited v Sayer [2009] NSWSC 427 Maralinga Pty Ltd v Major Enterprises Pty Ltd [1972] 2 NSWLR 101 McMahon v National Foods Milk Ltd (2009) 25 VR 251 Olsson v Dyson (1969) 120 CLR 365 Orica Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) [2010] FCA 197 Poort v Development Underwriting (Victoria) Pty Ltd (No 2) [1977] VR 454 Saunders v Leonardi (1976) 1 BPR 97,042 Schindler v Pigault (1975) 30 P & CR 328 Upper Hunter County Council v Australian Chilling and Freezing Co Pty (1968) 118 CLR 429 Vickery v Woods (1952) 85 CLR 336 Texts Cited: CJ Rossiter, Requisitions and Objections on Title: The time for delivery; the vendor's obligation to answer properly made requisitions; the purchaser's remedy for inadequate or erroneous answers (2000) 8 APLJ 97 JW Carter, Breach of Contract (2nd ed, 1991, The Law Book Company Ltd) RP Meagher, JD Heydon, MJ Leeming, Meagher, Gummow & Lehane's Equity: Doctrines and Remedies (5th ed, 2015, LexisNexis Butterworths) Category: Principal judgment Parties: First Plaintiff/Cross Defendant: Fu Tian Fortune Pty Ltd ACN 611 503 256 Second Plaintiff/Cross Defendant: Defu Zhang Defendant/Cross Claimant: Park Cho Pty Ltd ACN 096 066 250 Representation: Counsel: Plaintiffs/Cross Defendants: G.W. McGrath SC; A. Norrie Defendant/Cross Claimant: N. Kirby
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate