NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Dimakos (a pseudonym) [2018] NSWCCA 78 Hearing dates: 23 April 2018 Decision date: 30 April 2018 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Rothman J at [2] Button J at [6] Decision: (1)The sentence imposed by Judge Frearson SC on 2 February 2017 is quashed; (2)The respondent is sentenced to a non-parole period of one year, four months and two weeks, to commence on 2 February 2017 and conclude 15 June 2018, with a parole period of one year, four months and two weeks, to expire on 29 October 2019; (3)The respondent will be released to parole on 15 June 2018. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Crown appeal against sentence – s 5DA Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – where respondent undertook to provide assistance by giving evidence against co-offender – sentencing judge allowed 9% discount for promised future assistance – respondent failed to give promised future assistance at trial of co-offender– whether respondent failed wholly or partly fulfil his undertaking – whether discretion not to increase sentence by removing discount should be exercised Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 23 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5DA Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 38 Cases Cited: R v MG [2016] NSWCCA 304 R v Pambris [2018] NSWDC 24 R v Shahrouk [2014] NSWCCA 87 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina Spiros Dimakos (a pseudonym) Representation: Counsel: F Veltro (Crown) M C Ramage QC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate