NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: GW v R [2018] NSWCCA 79 Hearing dates: 16 April 2018 Date of orders: 02 May 2018 Decision date: 02 May 2018 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Fullerton J at [2]; Davies J at [53] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal is granted. 2. The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – applicant entered pleas of guilty to 29 offences contrary to ss 61J(1), 61M(1), 91G(1)(a) and 91H(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61J(1), 61M(1), 61M(2), 91G(1)(a), 91H(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 3A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5(1)(c) Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 (NSW), s 7(1) Cases Cited: DG v R [2017] NSWCCA 139 DV v R [2017] NSWCCA 276 Faehringer v R [2017] NSWCCA 248 Hughes v R [2018] NSWCCA 2 JL v R [2014] NSWCCA 130 Krivosic v R [2017] NSWCCA 167 Obeid v R [2017] NSWCCA 221 Vandeventer v R [2013] NSWCCA 33 Category: Principal judgment Parties: GW (Applicant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Kluss (Applicant) B Hatfield (Crown)
Solicitors: Ross Hill and Associate Solicitors (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2016/115474 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Date of Decision: 5 July 2017 Before: Buscombe DCJ File Number(s): 2016/115474
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate