Young v Roads and Maritime Services (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 91

Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Young v Roads and Maritime Services (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 91 Hearing dates: 23 April 2018 Decision date: 23 April 2018 Before: Beazley P Decision: (1) The amended urgent notice of motion is dismissed.

(2) The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs of the amended urgent notice of motion. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – whether order should be made for court-annexed mediation – whether respondent's solicitor should be directed not to attend mediation – whether new independent legal representatives for respondent should be appointed – what procedural steps applicant should take to review earlier Court of Appeal decision Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 36.17 Cases Cited: Kallinicos v Hunt (2005) 64 NSWLR 561; [2005] NSWSC 1181 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Maureen Mary Young (Applicant) Roads and Maritime Services (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: In person (Applicant) P M Lane (Respondent)

Solicitors: In person (Applicant) Office of the Crown Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/384578

[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]