NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Limited v Shade Systems Limited [2018] NSWSC 540 Hearing dates: 24/04/2018 Date of orders: 24 April 2018 Decision date: 24 April 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: McDougall J Decision: Grant defendant leave to amend its Technology & Construction List Response. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – application to amend Technology & Construction List Response – proposed amendment pleads that maintenance of litigation is unconscionable within the meaning of the Australian Consumer Law – whether proposed amended defence so weak so as to justify peremptory rejection – no rule of law that litigious conduct cannot be conduct in trade or commerce – instead, determining strength of proposed defence will require consideration of the overall evidence – leave to amend granted. Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law (Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)) Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Cases Cited: Bride v The Shire of Katanning [2016] FCA 65 Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Limited v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594 Macks v Viscariello [2017] SASCFC 172 Pertzel v Qld Paulownia Forests Ltd [2008] 2 Qd R 526 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Shade Systems Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: S Robertson (Plaintiff) D Hume (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate