NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: CJW v R [2018] NSWCCA 80 Hearing dates: 16 April 2018 Date of orders: 04 May 2018 Decision date: 04 May 2018 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Fullerton J at [89]; Davies J at [91] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – conviction appeal – assault with an act of indecency on a person under the age of 16 years – whether jury verdict unreasonable and cannot be supported having regard to the evidence – no reliance placed on inconsistent verdicts – basis for appeal was that the evidence did not support the offence occurring within the narrow timeframe available – submission that date of offending in the indictment an essential element for the Crown to establish – whether timeframe for offending as narrow as asserted by applicant – open to jury to find offence proved beyond reasonable doubt – leave to appeal granted but appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – s 61M(2) Cases Cited: Cawthray v R [2013] NSWCCA 105 Hawi v R [2014] NSWCCA 83 M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63; 181 CLR 487 R v Kennedy [2000] NSWCCA 487; 118 A Crim R 34 SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; 243 CLR 400 Stringer v R [2000] NSWCCA 293; 116 A Crim R 198 Category: Principal judgment Parties: CJW – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: P Rosser QC/A Mooney – Applicant B Hatfield – Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate