NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: B1 v B2 (No. 3) [2018] NSWDC 108 Hearing dates: 26 April 2018 Date of orders: 26 April 2018 Decision date: 26 April 2018 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: See [32] Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – defamation proceedings commenced by the plaintiff against his former wife – plaintiff not informed of sale of his former wife's home – plaintiff brings application for freezing orders on the basis that this is the defendant's sole asset of substance – whether there is a good arguable case – whether the any prospective judgment would be partly or wholly unsatisfied – freezing orders made on an interim basis Legislation Cited: District Court Act 1973 (NSW), ss 44 and 46 Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), s 64 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 25.11 to 25.14 Cases Cited: Agar v Hyde (2000) 201 CLR 552 B1 v B2 [2017] NSWDC 252 Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 380 Kirkham v Tassone [2015] SASC 6 Megna v Marshall [2012] NSWSC 436 Ninemia Maritime Corporation v Trave Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co KG "The Niedersachsen" [1983] 1 WLR 1412 Samimi v Seyedabadi; Seyedabadi v Samimi [2013] NSWCA 279 Severstal Export GmbH v Bhushan Steel Ltd (2013) 84 NSWLR 141 Texts Cited: Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure NSW Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Plaintiff: B1 Defendant: B2 Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: Mr M J Lewis Defendant: No appearance
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate