NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Berton v R [2018] NSWCCA 81 Hearing dates: 23 April 2018 Date of orders: 04 May 2018 Decision date: 04 May 2018 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL [1]; Rothman J at [51]; Button J at [57] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal be granted. (2) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – conviction appeal – cultivation of cannabis by enhanced indoor means – shed being used to hydroponically grow cannabis plants – co-offender tending plants – whether sufficient evidence to connect lessee paying rent for shed to joint criminal enterprise – sufficient evidence available – open to jury to find beyond reasonable doubt that offence proved. Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – s 5(1)(b) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) – s 23(2)(a) Cases Cited: Dickson v R [2017] NSWCCA 78 Gillard v The Queen [2003] HCA 64; 219 CLR 1 SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; 243 CLR 400 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Olivier Lawrence Berton aka Stephan Berton – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: A Bellanto QC – Applicant E Balodis – Respondent Crown
Solicitors: Y Maksisi – Applicant Solicitor for Public Prosecutions – Respondent Crown File Number(s): 2015/204442 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 1 June 2017 Before: English DCJ File Number(s): 2015/204442
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate