NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lawcover Insurance Pty Ltd v Muriniti and Newell [2018] NSWSC 558 Hearing dates: 18 April 2018 Decision date: 03 May 2018 Before: Sackar J Decision: See para [42]-[43] Catchwords: COSTS – appropriate principles and considerations – indemnity costs – lump sum or gross costs order – whether indemnity costs or lump sum costs order should be made – appropriate discount to lump sum or gross costs order Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ann Ross v John William Padget [2016] NSWSC 1851 Cultus Petroleum v OMV Australia [1999] NSWSC 435 Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397 Hamod v The State of New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 375 Harrison v Schipp (2002) 54 NSWLR 738 Seller v Jones [2014] NSWCA 19 Category: Costs Parties: Lawcover Insurance Pty Ltd (First Applicant) Leonardo Carlo Muriniti (First Respondent/Defendant) Robert Duane Newell (Second Respondent/Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Zahra (Plaintiff) R D Newell (Defendants)
Solicitors: Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Plaintiff) L. C. Muriniti & Associates (Defendants) File Number(s): 2017/193095
Judgment 1. I gave judgment in this matter in Lawcover's favour on 16 November 2017. On 15 December I made final orders requiring the Defendants to pay Lawcover's costs of the proceedings and permitting Lawcover to make an application for indemnity costs or costs on a lump sum basis within 28 days of the entry of the final orders. 2. Lawcover filed a motion on 12 January 2018 seeking orders that the costs of the proceedings be paid by the Defendants in a fixed lump sum and on an indemnity basis ($395,522.43) or in the alternative on the standard basis ($366,141.36) and that its costs of the motion also be paid by the Defendants in a fixed lump sum on the standard basis ($15,588.00). 3. In support of the motion Lawcover seeks to rely on an affidavit of Mr John Coorey dated 12 January 2018 and an expert report of Mr Ross Nicholas dated 6 February 2018. As a result of these reports Lawcover now seeks revised amounts of $377,628.96 on an indemnity basis or in the alternative $308,857.56 on a standard basis. The Defendants oppose an order for indemnity costs and a lump sum approach and rely upon an affidavit of Mr Muriniti of 4 April 2018.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate