NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: TX Australia Pty Ltd v Network Ten Pty Ltd; Network Ten Pty Ltd v TX Australia Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 559 Hearing dates: 05 April 2018 Decision date: 01 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Declare that the plaintiff is required by the shareholders agreement to register the transfer of the first defendant's shares in the plaintiff to the second and third defendants Catchwords: CONTRACTS – construction – shareholders agreement – mechanism for compulsory disposition to remaining shareholders or third party in certain events – whether compulsory disposal mechanism triggered – provision for expert determination of price at which shares to be purchased by remaining shareholders – whether determination can be impugned – whether expert entitled to determine methodology by which price to be determined – whether price means market value or fair and reasonable value of the shares – whether expert erred in adopting market value – whether expert made determination of the kind specified in the shareholders agreement – whether compulsory disposition mechanism void for uncertainty Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Cases Cited: Australian Vintage Ltd v Belvino Investments No 2 Pty Ltd (2015) 90 NSWLR 367; [2015] NSWCA 275 Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2009] 1 AC 1101 Fitzgerald v Masters (1956) 95 CLR 420 MMAL Rentals Pty Ltd v Bruning (2004) 63 NSWLR 167; [2004] NSWCA 451 Spencer v The Commonwealth of Australia (1907) 5 CLR 418; [1907] HCA 82 State of New South Wales v Banabelle Electrical Pty Ltd (2002) 54 NSWLR 503; [2002] NSWSC 178 Triarno Pty Ltd v Triden Contractors Ltd (1992) 10 BCL 305 Category: Principal judgment Parties: TX Australia Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Network Ten Pty Limited (First Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Nine Network Australia Pty Limited (Second Defendant/Cross-Defendant) Seven Network (Operations) Limited (Third Defendant/Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A S Bell SC with D F C Thomas (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) A Leopold SC with A Hochroth (First Defendant/Cross-Claimant) K Williams SC with R Mansted (Second Defendant/Cross-Defendant) D Sulan (Third Defendant/Cross-Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate