NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Grant v Gillham ; Christopher J Grant Pty Ltd v Gillham [2018] NSWCATAP 104 Hearing dates: 29 January 2018 Date of orders: 02 May 2018 Decision date: 02 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: L Pearson, Principal Member D Robertson, Senior Member Decision: In AP 17/43000 (1) Leave to appeal is refused. (2) The appeal is dismissed.
In AP 17/42976 (1) The appeal is allowed. (2) Set aside order 2 made on 14 September 2017. (3) Remit the proceedings to the Consumer and Commercial Division for rehearing and determination consistently with these reasons. Catchwords: APPEAL: Home building – Identity of contracting parties – Breach – Determination of compensation – Adequacy of reasons Legislation Cited: Business Names Act 1962 (NSW) Business Names Registration Act 2011 (Cth) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW) Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Cases Cited: Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 County Securities Pty Ltd v Challenger Group Holdings Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 193 Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640 Housing NSW v Hamilton [2015] NSWCATAP 136 John Prendergast & Vanessa Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Lym International Pty Ltd v Marcolongo [2011] NSWCA 303 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang(1996) 185 CLR 259 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Limited v Wright Prospecting Pty Limited [2015] HCA 37 New South Wales Land & Housing Corporation v Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2015] NSWSC 176 Pethybridge v Stedikas Holdings Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 154 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 Suncorp Metway Insurance Ltd v Owners Corporation SP 64487 [2009] NSWCA 223 Tomko v Palasty [2007] NSWCA 258 Wainohu v New South Wales (2011) 243 CLR 181 Category: Principal judgment Parties: AP 17/42976: Christopher Grant and Christopher J Grant Pty Ltd (Appellants) Mark Gillham and Jane Gillham (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate