NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Zhang v R [2018] NSWCCA 82 Hearing dates: 18 April 2018 Date of orders: 04 May 2018 Decision date: 04 May 2018 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Fullerton J at [57]; Davies J at [58] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal be granted. (2) The appeal be dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – supply of large commercial quantity of a prohibited drug – no specific discount for early plea of guilty referred to in reasons for sentence – whether explanation pursuant to s 11 of Criminal Appeal Act 1912 appropriate – sufficient indicia that discount had been allowed – leave to appeal granted but appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – s 93T(1A) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – ss 5(1)(c), 11 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) – s 25(2) Cases Cited: Butters v R [2010] NSWCCA 1 Edwards v R [2017] NSWCCA 160 Imbornone v R [2017] NSWCCA 144 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; 252 CLR 601 Lee v R [2016] NSWCCA 146 Pfitzner v R [2010] NSWCCA 314 R v DF [2005] NSWCCA 259 R v Harrison [2006] NSWCCA 185 R v Henare [2005] NSWCCA 366 R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353; 127 A Crim R 369 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; 53 NSWLR 704 R v Sloane [2001] NSWCCA 421; 126 A Crim R 188 Vos v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 234 Woodward v The Queen [2014] NSWCCA 205 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Si Ji Zhang – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Dr G Woods QC/T Woods – Applicant NJ Adams – Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate