NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Huang v Wong [2018] NSWCA 94 Hearing dates: 18 April 2018 Date of orders: 18 April 2018 Decision date: 07 May 2018 Before: Beazley P; Meagher JA; Simpson AJA Decision: Notice of Motion dismissed Catchwords: LEGAL PRACTITIONERS – application for order that respondent's legal representatives withdraw from proceedings – no conflict of interest – Solicitors' Conduct Rule 12.1 – Barristers Conduct Rule 101(b) – allegation of professional misconduct – Kallinicos v Hunt – whether intervention by the court justified
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where litigation referred for pro bono assistance – where avenues of pro bono assistance exhausted – order terminating referral made Legislation Cited: Barristers Conduct Rule 101(b) Solicitors' Conduct Rule 12.1 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) 7.36(1) (sub r 4A); 51.56 Cases Cited: Kallinicos v Hunt (2005) 64 NSWLR 561; [2005] NSWSC 1181 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Chao (Isabel) Huang (Appellant) Kam S Wong (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Appellant in person M Hutchings (Respondent)
Solicitors: Appellant in person Meridian Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/351845 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Jurisdiction: Civil Date of Decision: 03 November 2016 Before: Gibb DCJ File Number(s): 2013/333703
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate