NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rema Tip Top Asia Pacific Pty Ltd v Grüterich [2018] NSWSC 591 Hearing dates: 17 and 20 April 2018 Decision date: 04 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Robb J Decision: See paragraph [116] Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Interim preservation — Freezing orders — Variation of — whether freezing order should be discharged — whether the amount the subject of the freezing order should be reduced — whether the defendant should be allowed increased living expenses and legal costs out of the subject of the freezing order Cases Cited: Alka Developments Pty Ltd v Lemery Holdings Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 1335 Patterson v BTR Engineering (Aust) Pty Ltd (1989) 18 NSWLR 319 Salib v Gakas; Newport Pacific Pty Ltd v Salib [2010] NSWSC 505 David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353 Melbourne Stadiums Ltd v Sautner [2015] FCAFC 20; (2015) 317 ALR 665 Shepherd v Felt and Textiles of Australia Ltd (1931) 45 CLR 359 Downer EDI Ltd v Gillies [2012] NSWCA 333; (2012) 229 IR 314 Bibby Financial Services Australia Pty Ltd V Sharma [2014] NSWCA 37 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Rema Tip Top Asia Pacific Pty Ltd (ABN 63 104 702 14) (Plaintiff) Christian Grüterich (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: N Furlan (Plaintiff) J Knackstredt (Defendant)
Solicitors: Gilbert + Tobin (Plaintiff) Schweizer Kobras (Defendant) File Number(s): 2018/117085
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate