NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Beech v Squire [2018] NSWSC 594 Hearing dates: 15, 16 May 2017; 13 October 2017; written submissions 25, 30 May 2017 Decision date: 04 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity - Family Provision List Before: Kunc J Decision: Summons dismissed Catchwords: SUCCESSION — Family provision and maintenance — Claim by two adult children against insolvent estate — Small estate even if notional estate order made — Succession Act 2006, ss 59, 60, 78 Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Camernik v Reholc [2012] NSWSC 1537 Cooper v Dungan (1976) 9 ALR 93; (1976) 50 ALJR 539 Goodman v Windeyer (1980) 144 CLR 490;[1980] HCA 31 Hughes v National Trustees Executors and Agency Co of Australasia Ltd (1979) 143 CLR 134; [1979] HCA 2 Luciano v Rosenblum (1985) 2 NSWLR 65 Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11; (1998) 193 CLR 72 Sgro v Thompson [2017] NSWCA 326 Verzar v Verzar [2014] NSWCA 45 West v Mann [2013] NSWSC 1852 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Claire Louise Isobel Beech (First Plaintiff) Paul Francis Aubrey Squire (Second Plaintiff)
Corrine Ann Squire (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A G Martin (Plaintiffs) P R Glissan (Defendant)
Solicitors: Branson Neville Lawyers (Plaintiffs) Roderick Storie Solicitors (Defendant) File Number(s): 2016/1222471 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate