NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Nitopi, Cristina v Nitopi, Giuseppe [2018] NSWSC 609 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 07 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: R A Hulme J Decision: Costs on an indemnity basis refused Catchwords: COSTS – application for costs on indemnity basis – where Court dismissed plaintiff's statement of claim for want of due dispatch with costs – where proceedings delayed by plaintiff for 3 years – whether plaintiff's conduct amounted to relevant delinquency – no further evidence provided showing plaintiff responsible for abuse of processes of the Court – whether Court functus officio upon making costs order – order not reduced to writing or entered up – Court not functus officio – application for costs on indemnity basis refused. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 55, 56, 59, 98 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 12.7, 42.2 Cases Cited: Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225; [1993] FCA 801 Hamod v State of New South Wales (2002) 188 ALR 659; [2002] FCA 424 Harrison v Schipp (2002) 54 NSWLR 738; [2002] NSWCA 213 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Category: Costs Parties: Cristina Pirrello Nitopi (Plaintiff) Giuseppe Nitopi (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Folino-Gallo (Plaintiff) Mr H Stitt (Defendant)
Solicitors: Prime Lawyers Hunter Lawyers File Number(s): 2015/94733
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate