NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Zeait v Singh [2018] NSWCATAP 109 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 10 May 2018 Decision date: 10 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: R Titterton, Principal Member Dr J Lucy, Senior Member Decision: 1. Appeal dismissed. 2. Leave to appeal refused. 3. The respondent to file submissions as to costs on or before 24 May 2018. 4. The appellant may respond on or before 7 June 2018. Catchwords: COSTS – Application of r 38(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 – meaning of "the amount claimed or in dispute in the proceedings is more than $30,000" Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Regulation 2013 (NSW) Cases Cited: Allen v TriCare (Hastings) Ltd [2017] NSWCATAP 25 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Champion Homes Pty Ltd v Guirgis [2018] NSWCATAP 54 House v Defence Force Retirement and Death Benefits Authority (2011) 193 FCR 112 Jackson v NSW Land and Housing Corporation [2014] NSWCATAP 22 Matterson v Sunrise Pools Australia Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCATAP 211 Moloney v Collins [2011] NSWSC 628 Thompson v Chapman [2016] NSWCATAP 6 Category: Costs Parties: Rony Zeait t/as AAA Perfect Excavation & Demolition (Appellant) Vikramjit Singh (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate