NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Glynn Kaderavek v R [2018] NSWCCA 92 Hearing dates: 28 March 2018 Date of orders: 11 May 2018 Decision date: 11 May 2018 Before: Beazley P at [1]; Schmidt J at [2]; Hamill J at [3] Decision: (1) Application for leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal allowed. (3) The aggregate sentence imposed in the District Court is quashed and in lieu thereof: (4) The applicant is sentenced to an aggregate sentence of 7 years commencing 7 April 2015 and expiring 6 April 2022 with a non-parole period of 4 years and 6 months commencing 7 April 2015 and expiring on 6 October 2019. (5) The applicant will be eligible for release to parole at the conclusion of the non-parole period. Catchwords: CRIME – application for leave to appeal against sentence – domestic violence – repeated serious offending against same victim – unusual chronology – pre-existing sentence relating to offences committed after the subject offences – correct commencement date – where sentence summary apt to mislead sentencing Judge – incorrect commencement date – requirement that sentence takes into account time spent in custody for present offence – pre-existing sentence less than three years – statutory parole period – whether accumulation nullified finding of special circumstances – applicant re-sentenced Legislation Cited: Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW), s 158 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 33, 44, 47 and 53A Cases Cited: Cherry v R [2017] NSWCCA 150 DPP v Darcy-Shillingsworth [2017] NSWCCA 224 GP v R [2017] NSWCCA 200 Greenyer v R [2016] NSWCCA 272 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Lehn v R [2016] NSWCCA 255 R v Hamid [2006] NSWCCA 302; (2006) 164 A Crim R 179 R v Johnson [2015] NSWSC 31 R v McHugh (1985) 1 NSWLR 588 R v Newman and Simpson [2004] NSWCCA 102; (2004) 145 A Crim R 361 R v Wiggins [2010] NSWCCA 30 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Glynn Kaderavek (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Quilter (Appellant) H Roberts (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate