Li v Attorney General for New South Wales [2018] NSWSC 674

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Li v Attorney General for New South Wales [2018] NSWSC 674 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 28 May 2018 Decision date: 28 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison J Decision: Application dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – application for inquiry into sentence imposed by the District Court – applicant convicted of knowingly taking part in the supply of not less than the large commercial quantity of a prohibited drug – appeal dismissed by the Court of Criminal Appeal – appearance of doubt or question as to mitigating circumstances not demonstrated – application dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), ss 78, 79 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Cases Cited: Alkhair v R (2016) 255 A Crim R 419; [2016] NSWCCA 4 Duncan, Paul Parepano – Applicant pursuant to Part 7 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2014] NSWSC 847 Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions (ACT) (2003) 214 CLR 318; [2004] HCA 28 Green v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Koh v R [2013] NSWCCA 287 Li v R [2014] NSWCCA 341 Milat, Ivan Robert Marko – Application under Section 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2015] NSWSC 209 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Sinkovich v Attorney General of New South Wales (2013) 85 NWLR 783; [2013] NSWCA 383 Varley v Attorney General of New South Wales (1987) 8 NSWLR 30 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Patrick Pak Lam Li (Applicant) Attorney General for NSW (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: N M Kelly