NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Steffan Treptower [2018] NSWSC 677 Hearing dates: 11 May 2018 Decision date: 11 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Button J Decision: (1) I do not propose to make orders 1 and 2 and, accordingly, orders 3, 4 and 5 will not be entertained by me ex parte. (2) The matter is stood over to the Common Law Registrar's List at 9.00am next Thursday, 17 May 2018. Catchwords: PROCEEDS OF CRIME – application for order for compulsory examination – threshold question whether to proceed ex parte – no compelling reason for proceeding ex parte established – application dismissed Legislation Cited: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth), ss 180, 180B Cases Cited: Clough v Leahy (1904) 2 CLR 139; [1904] HCA 38 DPP (Cth) v Galloway (a Pseudonym) & Ors [2017] VSCA 120 International Finance Trust Co Ltd v NSW Crime Commission (2009) 261 ALR 220; [2009] HCA 49 Lee v The Queen (2014) 88 ALR 656; [2014] HCA 20 R v Seller; R v McCarthy [2015] NSWCCA 76 Strickland (A Pseudonym) & Ors v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions & Ors [2017] HCATrans 238 X7 v Australian Crime Commission [2013] HCA 29; (2013) 248 CLR 92 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (Applicant) Steffan Treptower (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Victoria O'Halloran (Applicant) Ex parte (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate