NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Morrison-Conway & Anor; Estate of the Late Judith Christine Walsh [2018] NSWSC 685 Hearing dates: 28 March and 4 May 2018 Date of orders: 07 May 2018 Decision date: 21 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Judicial Advice given. Plaintiff's costs to be paid out of the estate on the indemnity basis. Catchwords: JUDICIAL ADVICE – Trustee Act s 63 – proceedings seek judicial advice in relation to the identification of certain charities – proceedings are charitable trust proceedings "with respect to the administration of a charitable trust" within the Charitable Trusts Act 1993 s 5 – the Attorney General is a party – the will of a testatrix makes bequests to three organisations described as charities – whether or not each bequest describes an existing charitable organisation - whether any of the bequests fails for wont of sufficient identification of an existing charitable body – whether with respect to any failed gift the will exhibits a general charitable intention – whether, in respect of any failed gift, if the will exhibits a general charitable intention, the Court should order a cy-pres scheme
MEDIATION – Mediation of related proceedings for family provision ordered under Civil Procedure Act s 26 – the mediation to take place in the near term – if one or more of the gifts to charity were to fail, who is to represent the interests of charity associated with the gift at the mediation.
WILL – construction – proper construction of will which requires the executors and trustees to make a "diversity" of investments – meaning of expression – whether the expression alters the duties of the executors and trustees. Legislation Cited: Adoption Act 2000, s 95(2)(d) Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act 1995, s 50 Charities Act 2013 (Cth) 12(1)(a), Charitable Trusts Act 1993, ss 10, 13(2), 14 Health Services Act 1997 NSW Trustee & Guardian Act 2009, s 54 Succession Act 2006, ss 10, 27(1)(b) Trustee Act 1925, ss 14(C)(1)(b), 63 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, Division 1 in Part 55 Cases Cited: Application of Harnett and Cutts [2016] NSWSC 427 Application by NSW Trustee & Guardian (Estate of the late Marko Sijakovic [2012] NSWSC 1532 Attorney General v Bouchett 53 E.R. 580; (1858) 25 Beav. 116 Public Trustee v Attorney General [2005] NSWSC 1267 Ware v Cumberlege 52 E.R. 697; (1855) 20 Beav. 503; Estate of the late Chow Cho-Poon; Application for Judicial Advice [2013] NSWSC 844 Jackson v Attorney General [1917] 2 Ch 420 Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Incorporated v His Eminence Petar Bishop of the Orthodox Diocese of Australia and New Zealand (2008) 237 CLR 66; [2008] HCA 42 Permanent Trustee Co Ltd v State of New South Wales (Supreme Court (NSW), Santow J, 23 November 1995, unrep) Re Benjamin; Neville v Benjamin [1902] 1 Ch 723 Re Daniels (deceased) [1970] VR 72 Re Davis; Hannen v Hillyer [1902] 1 Ch 876 Re Taylor (1888) 58 L.T. 538. Texts Cited: Neville and Ashe, Equity Proceedings with Precedents, at paragraph 506 Category: Principal judgment Parties: First Plaintiff: Peter George Morrison-Conway Second Plaintiff: Clare Josephine Andrews
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate