NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ku-ring-gai Council v Pathways Property Group Pty Ltd [2018] NSWLEC 73 Hearing dates: 2 May 2018 Date of orders: 21 May 2018 Decision date: 21 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Moore J Decision: 1 The appeal is dismissed; and 2 The Appellant is to pay the Respondent's costs as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: APPEAL - proposed additions and alterations to an aged care facility - application reliant on State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing for seniors and people with a disability) 2004 - s 56A appeal against decision of Commissioner to approve development - four grounds of appeal - Ground 1 alleges proposed development prohibited on the basis that State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing for Seniors and People with a Disability) 2004 was not available to approve proposed development - Ground 1 not raised before the Commissioner - whether jurisdiction to raise on appeal - within jurisdiction - merit - Ground 1 not established - however, if Ground 1 established, proper course to remit the matter to a Commissioner as Ground 1 not necessarily a complete bar to the proposed development - Grounds 2 to 4 pleaded defects in Commissioner's reasoning to approve proposed development - no defects in Commissioner's approach - appeal dismissed COSTS - no reason why costs should not follow the event - Appellant ordered to pay Respondent's costs as agreed or assessed Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98 Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001, s 67(1) Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2015, cll 2.3 and 4.6 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 56A Standard Instrument (Local Environmental Plans) Order 2006 State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 -Development Standards State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004, cll 2, 3, 5, 15 and 40 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, Pt 36 r 17 Cases Cited: Anderson v Director General of the Department of Environmental and Climate Change & Anor (2008) 163 LGERA 400; [2008] NSWCA 337 Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1; [1986] HCA 33 Edyp & Ors v Brazbuild Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 218 Georgakis v North Sydney Council [2004] NSWLEC 123 Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Limited (2010) 241 CLR 390; [2010] HCA 32 Pathways Property Group Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2017] NSWLEC 1486 Principal Healthcare Finance Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Ryde [2016] NSWLEC 153 Project Venture Developments v Pittwater Council [2005] NSWLEC 191 Schaffer Corporation v Hawkesbury City Council (1992) 77 LGRA 21 Segal & Anor v Waverley Council (2005) 64 NSWLR 177; [2005] NSWCA 310 University of Wollongong v. Metwally (No. 2) (1985) 59 ALJR 481; [1985] HCA 28 Veloshin v Randwick Council [2007] NSWLEC 428 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ku-ring-gai Council (Appellant) Pathways Property Group Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr T Howard SC (Appellant) Mr I Hemmings SC/Ms N Hammond, barrister (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate