NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Al Maha Pty Ltd v Coplin (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 104 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 17 May 2018 Before: Macfarlan JA; Meagher JA; Gleeson JA Decision: 1. Dismiss Mr Coplin's notice of motion filed on 21 December 2017. 2. Order Mr Coplin to pay the costs of Al Maha and PropertyFox of that motion. Catchwords: COSTS – party/party – general rule that costs follow the event – where primary judge upheld claims against one defendant, dismissed claims against other defendant and awarded costs against both defendants – where appellate court allowed appeal by unsuccessful defendant joining successful defendant as a respondent and seeking order dismissing statement of claim with costs – whether appellate court has power to order plaintiff to pay costs at first instance and on appeal of defendant successful at first instance – whether that power should not be exercised – no question of principle Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A(10) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.1 Cases Cited: John Alexander's Clubs Pty Ltd v White City Tennis Club Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 1; [2010] HCA 19 Category: Costs Parties: Al Maha Pty Ltd (Appellant) Iraklis Gary Coplin (First Respondent) PropertyFox Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: TM Faulkner SC (Appellant) M Green SC and B Oliak (First Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate