NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Pickham v Binary Engineering Pty Ltd (formerly Hyper Engineering Pty Ltd) [2018] NSWCA 105 Hearing dates: 27 April 2018 Decision date: 22 May 2018 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Ward JA at [2]; Barrett AJA at [3] Decision: 1. Appeal dismissed 2. That the appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal Catchwords: APPEAL – challenge to findings of fact – credibility findings – no matter of principle. Legislation Cited: District Court Act 1973 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Cases Cited: Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472; [1993] HCA 78 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Robinson Helicopter Company Incorporated v McDermott [2016] HCA 22; (2016) 90 ALJR 679 Szeto v Situ [2017] NSWCA 136 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Anthony Geoffrey Pickham (Appellant) Binary Engineering Pty Ltd (formerly Hyper Engineering Pty Ltd) (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr A Moutasallem (Appellant) Mr NJ Simpson (Respondent)
Solicitors: Lancaster Law & Mediation (Appellant) Hansons Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/213589 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Civil Date of Decision: 19 June 2017 Before: Olsson DCJ File Number(s): 2016/165558
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate