NSW Caselaw
Local Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v McNamara [2017] NSWLC 26 Hearing dates: 2 February 2017 Decision date: 18 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Magistrate Michael O'Brien Decision: Charges dismissed following withdrawal pursuant to section 208 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986. No basis for award of costs in favour of the accused established. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Miscellaneous powers of courts and judges - application for dismissal following withdrawal pursuant to s 208 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 – whether abuse of process – accused's submissions misconceived and must fail
CRIMINAL LAW – Costs – whether the investigation has been conducted unreasonably or there has been an unreasonable failure to investigate a relevant matter suggesting the accused might not be guilty - whether it is otherwise "just and reasonable" to award costs – application refused Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) ss 205, 206, 208, 212, 213, 214 Stock Diseases Regulation 2009 (NSW) cll 19, 21(1)(a), 35(2)(a), 35(3) Cases Cited: Caltex Refining Co Pty Ltd v Maritime Services Board of NSW (1995) 36 NSWLR 552; 78 A Crim R 368 Canceri v Taylor (1994) 123 ALR 667 Cliftleigh Haulage Pty Ltd v Byron Shire Council [2007] NSWCCA 13 Craig v State of South Australia [1995] HCA 58: (1998)184 CLR 163 De Varda v Constable Stengord (NSW Police) [2011] NSWSC 868 Dong v Hughes [2005] NSWSC 84 Evans v DPP [2000] NSWSC 1005 Fosse v DPP [1999] NSWSC 367 Halpin v Department of Gaming and Racing [2007] NSWSC 815 Jago v District Court (NSW) (1989) 168 CLR 23 JD v DPP & Ors [2000] NSWSC 1092 Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales [2010] HCA 1; (2010) 239 CLR 531 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 Lawson v Wallace (1968) 88 WN (pt. 1) 505 Lay v Cleary ( unreported, NSW Supreme Court, James J, 23 February 1993) O'Brien v Hutchinson [2012] NSWSC 429 Prosecutor General, Department of Environment and Climate Change v Gleeson (2009) 165 LGERA 99 Prosecutor of Public Prosecutions v Gobden [1999] NSWSC 696; (1999) 6 Crim LN 54 [1024] Prosecutor of Public Prosecutions v Shirvanian (1998) 44 NSWLR 129; 102 A Crim R 180 R v Feeney [2012] ACTSC 153 R v Hunt [1999] NSWCCA 375 RB v DPP [2015] NSWSC 248 Silbert v DPP (WA) (2004) 205 ALR 43; 78 ALJR 464; [2004] HCA 9 Wang v Farkas [2014] NSWCA 29 Category: Principal judgment Parties: NSW Police (prosecution) Mr M McNamara (defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr Thomas (for the defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate