State of NSW v Elomar [2018] NSWSC 708

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: State of NSW v Elomar [2018] NSWSC 708 Hearing dates: 03 May 2018 Date of orders: 03 May 2018 Decision date: 03 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: The Court notes: (1) The evidence that the State intends to adduce in these proceedings includes an exhibit called "Exhibit X–1".

(2) The State has prepared the following copies of Exhibit X–1: (a) one that is watermarked to indicate that it is for the solicitor for the defendant ("the defendant's principal solicitor's copy of Exhibit X–1"); (b) one that is watermarked to indicate that it is for the solicitor employed by the solicitor for the defendant and assigned to undertake work in respect of these proceedings ("the defendant's employed solicitor's copy of Exhibit X–1"); (c) one that is watermarked to indicate that it is for counsel for the defendant ("the defendant's counsel's copy of Exhibit X -1"); and (d) one that is watermarked to indicate that it is to be the Court's working copy of Exhibit X–1 ("the Court's working copy of Exhibit X–1") (together, "the copies of Exhibit X–1").

The Court orders: (3) Exhibit X–1, the copies of Exhibit X–1, and the documents and information therein shall be dealt with as terrorism intelligence (within the meaning of "terrorism intelligence" in the Terrorism (High Risk Offenders) Act 2017) in accordance with Orders 4 to 16.

(4) Forthwith upon demand by or on behalf of the defendant, the State shall serve on the solicitor for the defendant the defendant's principal solicitor's copy of Exhibit X–1, the defendant's employed solicitor's copy, and the defendant's counsel's copy of Exhibit X–1.