NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Sparos [2018] NSWSC 712 Hearing dates: 14 May 2018 Date of orders: 21 May 2018 Decision date: 21 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison J Decision: (1) Uphold the Commissioner's claim for public interest immunity in relation to the undisclosed portion of the document known as IN264. (2) Direct under s 130(1) that IN264 not be adduced in this trial. (3) Set aside paragraph 4 of Mr Sparos' subpoena to the extent that the Commissioner is not required to produce IN264. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – privilege – public interest immunity – matters of state – subpoena – criminal proceedings – whether public interest in confidentiality outweighs public interest in disclosure to the accused – where document relates to a confidential source of information – where disclosure may prejudice the prevention, investigation or prosecution of an offence – where document contains irrelevant material – public interest immunity upheld Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 130 Cases Cited: Alister v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 404; [1984] HCA 85 Attorney General (NSW) v Kaddour & Turkmani [2001] NSWCCA 456 Attorney General (NSW) v Lipton (2012) 224 A Crim R 177; [2012] NSWCA 156 Attorney General for New South Wales v Smith (1996) 86 A Crim R 308 Attorney General for New South Wales v Stuart (1994) 34 NSWLR 667 Beneficial Finance Corporation Ltd v Commissioner of Australian Federal Police (1991) 51 A Crim R 423 Eastman v R (1997) 76 FCR 9 Gardiner v R (2006) 162 A Crim R 233; [2006] NSWCCA 190 Obeid v Ipp (2012) 224 A Crim R 177; [2012] NSWCA 156 Public Transport Ticketing Corporation v Integrated Transit Solutions [2010] NSWSC 607 R v Abdullah [1999] NSWCA 188 R v Sparos [2018] NSWSC 711 Ryan v Victoria [2015] VSCA 353 State of New South Wales v Public Transport Ticketing Corporation [2011] NSWCA 60 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Commissioner of Police (Applicant) Luke John Sparos (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Grady (Commissioner of Police) C Smith SC with D Carroll (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate