NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Trajkovski v Simpson [2018] NSWSC 720 Hearing dates: 12-16 March 2018 Date of orders: 21 May 2018 Decision date: 21 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Fagan J Decision: 1. The second further amended statement of claim is dismissed. 2. The plaintiff is to pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: TORTS – negligence – professional negligence – legal practitioners – plaintiff entitled to payment from husband under Family Court consent orders – where defendants represented husband in matrimonial property dispute and in relation to encumbrance and sale of matrimonial property –wife separately represented in matrimonial proceedings initially – wife terminated retainer of her solicitor and became unrepresented – proceeds from sale of land not used to satisfy payment to plaintiff pursuant to consent orders – whether husband's solicitors owed duty of care to wife – whether defendants acted under conflict of duties – whether unconscionable conduct of defendants under the general law or within meaning of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 51AB – ostensible authority and agency – whether husband was ostensible agent of wife in giving instructions to husband's solicitors – claim dismissed Legislation Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Revised Professional Conduct and Practice Rules 1995 (NSW) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Cases Cited: Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447; [1983] HCA 14 Hill v Van Erp (1997) 188 CLR 159; [1997] HCA 9 Hurley v McDonald's Australia Ltd [1999] FCA 1728 Feldman v GNM Australia Ltd [2017] NSWCA 107 Kobelt v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2018] FCAFC 18 Perera v Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance (2017) 94 NSWLR 83; [2017] NSWCA 19 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Suzana Trajkovski (plaintiff) Ian Garnet Simpson (first defendant) Simpson & Partners Solicitors Pty Ltd (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms Jill McIntosh (plaintiff) Mr James Emmett/Mr Harrison Grace (defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate