NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Dunphy v Russell [2018] NSWSC 721 Hearing dates: 3 and 4 April 2018 Decision date: 24 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Sackville AJA Decision: 1. Declare that the Defendant holds the proceeds of sale of the Property referred to in the Summons on trust for the Plaintiff as to a one third share. 2. Order that the Defendant pay from the proceeds of sale of the Property the sum of $379,000, being one third of the proceeds of sale. 3. Direct that the moneys held in the controlled moneys account referred to in the orders made by Darke J on 27 October 2017 be paid to the Plaintiff or at his direction. 4. Order that the Defendant pay the Plaintiff's costs of the proceedings. 5. Note that Orders 1-4 are subject to Orders 6-8. 6. Direct that any written submissions proposing amendments to Orders 1-4 be filed and served within 14 days. 7. Direct that if one party files written submissions within 14 days, the other party should file a reply within a further seven days. 8. If no written submissions are received within 14 days, Orders 1-4 will become final at the expiration of 14 days. Catchwords: TRUSTS – father contributes funds to the acquisition of a property by his daughter – whether the contribution was an investment or gift – whether the parties intended a trust to be created Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), ss 23C(1), 54A Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 140 Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), s 74K Statute of Frauds 1677 Cases Cited: Amit Laundry Pty Ltd v Jain [2017] NSWSC 1495 Associated Alloys Pty Ltd v ACN 001 452 106 Pty Ltd (In Liq) (2000) 202 CLR 588; [2000] HCA 25 Bloch v Bloch (1981) 180 CLR 390; [1981] HCA 56 Brogden v Metropolitan Railway Co (1877) 2 App Cas 666 Byrnes v Kendle (2011) 243 CLR 253 Cadd v Cadd (1909) 9 CLR 171; [1909] HCA 59 Ciaglia v Ciaglia [2010] NSWSC 341; 269 ALR 175 CSR Ltd v Adecco (Australia) Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 121 Korda v Australian Executor Trustees (SA) Ltd (2015) 255 CLR 62; [2015] HCA 6 Laidlaw v Hillier Hewitt Esley Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 44 Last v Rosenfeld [1972] 2 NSWLR 923 Nguyen v Phan (No 2) [2015] VSC 634 at [237] Re Australian Elizabethan Theatre Trust; Lord v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1991) 30 FCR 491 Rochefoucauld v Boustead [1895] 1 Ch 196 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Brian Patrick Dunphy (Plaintiff) Michelle Catherine Russell (nee Murphy) (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms E Peden / Ms J Mee (Plaintiff) Ms A Power (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate