NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Law Society of New South Wales v Osman [2018] NSWCATOD 75 Hearing dates: 14 March 2018 Date of orders: 23 May 2018 Decision date: 23 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: R Titterton, Principal Member L Pearson, Principal Member B Thomson, General Member Decision: 1. The respondent's name be removed from the roll of local lawyers.
2. The respondent is to pay the applicant's costs as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: PROFESSIONS AND TRADES – Solicitor – principal of incorporated legal practice – attempting to mislead Federal Court of Australia – making of false and misleading representations – purporting to act for five organisations or persons when no instructions to do so – swearing an affidavit knowing or ought to have known to be false - serving an affidavit knowing or ought to have known to be false Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Legal Profession Act 2004 Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) Cases Cited: A Solicitor v Law Society of New South Wales (2004) 216 CLR 253 Allinson v General Council of Medical Education and Registration [1894] 1 QB 750 Bowen-James v Walton (NSWCA, 5 August 1991, unrep) Brett v Solicitors Regulation Authority [2014] EWHC 2974 (Admin); [2015] PNLR 2 Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Ireland [2017] NSWCATOD 85 Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Wehbe [2018] NSWCATOD 14 Griffin v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales [2016] NSWCA 364 Health Care Complaints Commission v Sheehan [2016 NSWCATOD 89 Law Society of New South Wales v Bannister (1993) 4 LPDR 24 Law Society of New South Wales v MacKenzie [2003] NSWADT 92 Law Society of New South Wales v Shad [2002] NSWADT 236 Law Society of New South Wales v Walsh [1997] NSWCA 185 New South Wales Bar Association v Cummins (2001) 52 NSWLR 279 Prothonotary v Del Castillo [2001] NSWCA 75 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Council of the Law Society of New South Wales (Applicant) Ms Zenah Osman (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr P A Maddigan (Applicant) Mr J T Johnson (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate