NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Sparos [2018] NSWSC 740 Hearing dates: 22 May 2018 Date of orders: 23 May 2018 Decision date: 23 May 2018 Before: Harrison J Decision: The Crown's application to read the evidence given by Mr Sparos at his earlier trial is rejected. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – admissions – criminal proceedings – whether exculpatory statements by accused amount to admissions – whether such statements amount to implied admissions if untruthful – where accused gave evidence at first trial – where Crown seeks to read portions of that evidence in this trial – where evidence given by accused consistent with plea of not guilty Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 90, 135, 137 Cases Cited: Kuehne v R; Humphries M v R; Humphries A v R [2012] NSWCCA 270 R v Heffernan; R v Peters (NSWCCA, Smart J, 23 February 1998, unreported) R v Horton (1998) 45 NSWLR 426 R v McGregor (1967) 51 Cr App R 338 R v Mills [1986] VR 617 R v Sonnet [2011] VSC 551 R v Sparos [2018] NSWSC 714 Stuart v The King (1921) 29 CLR 234 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Luke John Sparos (Accused) Representation: Counsel: C Patrick SC (Crown) C Smith SC with D Carroll (Accused)
Solicitors: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Kiki Kyriacou Lawyers (Accused) File Number(s): 2014/196615 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate