NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Fantakis, Woods and Cheong [2018] NSWSC 749 Hearing dates: 9 May 2018 Date of orders: 09 May 2018 Decision date: 23 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Wilson J Decision: Application refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – trial – accused charged with murder – co-accused charged with accessory after the fact to murder – application to confine the Crown case – question of a "shift" in the Crown case – significance of Crown opening address – whether accused prejudiced by asserted "shift". Cases Cited: Cawthray v R [2013] NSWCCA 105 Cross and Channon (1973) 55 Cr. App. R. 540 Falconer-Atlee (1973) 58 Cr. App. R. 348 Gregory (1981) 77 Cr. App. R. 41 King v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 423 McManamy v Fleming (1889) 15 VLR 337 R v Kennedy (2000) 118 A Crim R 34; [2000] NSWCCA 487 R v Laird (1893) 14 NSWLR 354 R v Tangye (1997) 92 A Crim R 545 R v Thompson and Gamble (1925) 42 WN (NSW) 71 R v VHP (unreported decision of the NSWCCA, 7 July 1997) Category: Principal judgment Parties: The Crown Accused - Elefterios [Terry] FANTAKIS Accused - Andrew WOODS Accused - Derek CHEONG Representation: Counsel: Mr L Lungo as Crown Prosecutor Mr I Todd for the accused Fantakis Mr T Hughes for the accused Woods Mr D Price for the accused Cheong
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate