NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Auburn Shopping Village Pty Ltd v Nelmeer Hoteliers Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 114 Hearing dates: 19 February 2018 Date of orders: 28 May 2018 Decision date: 28 May 2018 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Beazley P at [68]; Payne JA at [69] Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: EQUITY – Equitable remedies – Relief against forfeiture – termination by vendor of agreement entered into pursuant to an option for sale of poker machine permits – whether purchaser had a subsisting equitable interest in permits arising apart from sale agreement – whether "unconscientious" for vendor to terminate agreement on grounds of surprise or mistake Legislation Cited: Gaming Machines Act 2001 (NSW) Personal Properties Security Act 2009 (Cth) Cases Cited: Australian Capital Financial Management Pty Ltd v Linfield Developments Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 99 Bahr v Nicolay (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 604; [1988] HCA 16 Brown v Heffer (1967) 116 CLR 344; [1967] HCA 40 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Jabetin Pty Ltd v Liquor Administration Board (2005) 63 NSWLR 602; [2005] NSWCA 92 Koompahtoo Local Aboriginal Land Council v Sanpine Pty Ltd (2007) 233 CLR 115; [2007] HCA 61 Laurinda Pty Ltd v Capalaba Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd (1989) 166 CLR 623; [1989] HCA 23 Laybutt v Amoco Australia Pty Ltd (1974) 132 CLR 57; [1974] HCA 49 Legione v Hateley (1983) 152 CLR 406; [1983] HCA 11 Mackay v Wilson (1947) 47 SR (NSW) 315 Mineralogy Pty Ltd v Sino Iron Pty Ltd (No 6) [2015] FCA 825 Pitt v Holt [2013] 2 AC 108 Shiloh Spinners Ltd v Harding [1973] AC 691 Stern v McArthur (1988) 165 CLR 489; [1988] HCA 51 Tanwar Enterprises Pty Ltd v Cauchi (2003) 217 CLR 315; [2003] HCA 57 Union Eagle Ltd v Golden Achievement Ltd [1997] AC 514 Texts Cited: J D Heydon, M Leeming and P G Turner, Meagher, Gummow & Lehane's Equity: Doctrines and Remedies (LexisNexis, 5th edn, 2015) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Auburn Shopping Village Pty Ltd (appellant) Nelmeer Hoteliers Pty Ltd (respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Burton SC with M Heath (appellant) A Bell SC with N Mirzai (respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate