NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Athari v Wandell Builders Pty [2018] NSWSC 771 Hearing dates: 24 May 2018 Date of orders: 24 May 2018 Decision date: 24 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: The appeal is dismissed and the plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – appealing decision and seeking leave to appeal - Magistrate failed to decide a material issue - mixed questions of fact and law - failure to adhere to timetable - notice of ceasing to act filed - no appearance for plaintiff before Registrar - efficiency of the Court - attempts made to contact the plaintiff - adequate notice given - whether the matter should be dismissed for want of cause - no motion seeking pro bono referral - whether proceedings should be dismissed in the absence of the plaintiff - case not prosecuted with due dispatch - prejudice to the defendant - failure of the plaintiff to appear - appeal dismissed - costs awarded Legislation Cited: Nil Cases Cited: Nil Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Taeed Athari trading as Father and Son v Wandell Builders Pty Representation: Counsel: I J King (Respondent)
Solicitors: MCW Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 17/374331 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Local Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Civil Date of Decision: 14 November 2017 Before: Magistrate Virgo File Number(s): 2016/226352
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate