NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: El-Bayeh v Bayeh [2018] NSWSC 775 Hearing dates: 21-23 August 2017; 25-26 October 2017 Date of orders: 31 May 2018 Decision date: 31 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison AsJ Decision: The Court orders that:
(1) The proceedings are dismissed.
(2) The plaintiff is to pay the defendants' costs on an ordinary basis. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – Credibility – whether witness is giving truthful evidence – Whether evidence is corroborated by other witnesses, contemporaneous records or reflects the most logical version of events
CONTRACTS – Formation – Agreement – whether the parties formed an oral agreement – Variation of agreement – Express Terms – Implied terms – whether terms are necessary for the effective or reasonable operation of the contract – Breach of contract – Right to damages
CONTRACT – Misleading conduct under statute – Misleading or deceptive conduct – Representations – Whether representation was made
ESTOPPEL – Estoppel by representation – Detrimental reliance – Whether representation was made
EQUITY – Unjust enrichment – Whether defendants were unjustly enriched at the expense of the plaintiff Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 91(2) Cases Cited: AAP Industries Pty Ltd v Rehau Pte Ltd [2017] NSWSC 390 Australian Financial Services and Leasing Pty Ltd v Hills Industries Ltd (2014) 253 CLR 560 Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410 Chikal Pty Limited & Anor v Youssef El Bayeh & Anor [2011] NSWSC 230 Chikal Pty Ltd v BI Construction Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1286 County Securities Pty Ltd v Challenger Group Holdings Ltd [2008] NSWCA 193 Fox v Percy (2003) 197 ALR 201; [2003] HCA 22 John Holland Pty Limited v Kellogg Brown & Root Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 451 Pavlovic v Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 313 Priestley v Priestley [2017] NSWCA 155 Winter v Nemeth [2018] NSWSC 644 Yousseff El Bayeh v Samir Bayeh & Ors [2011] NSWSC 101 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Yousseff El-Bayeh (Plaintiff) Samir Bayeh (First Defendant) Issam Issa (Second Defendant) BI Constructions (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: E Finnane (Plaintiff) J G Simpkins (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate