NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hunter New England Local Health District v Munters Pty Limited [2018] NSWSC 788 Hearing dates: 23 November 2017 Date of orders: 01 June 2018 Decision date: 01 June 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Bellew J Decision: 1. The proceedings are listed for further directions before me at 9.15 am on Friday 8 June 2018. 2. The parties are to prepare short minutes of orders to be made on the next occasion incorporating orders: (a) giving effect to the conclusions reached in this judgment; (b) for the ongoing management of these proceedings. 3. The costs of the amended notice of motion are reserved. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Discovery – Application for further discovery – General principles – Balancing exercise to be conducted in face of assertions by the plaintiff that compliance with an order for further discovery would be unduly onerous
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Evidence – Privilege – Where claims for privilege made over documents which would otherwise be discoverable – List of documents to properly set out the basis of any claim made – Necessity for the evidence relied upon in support of a claim for privilege to be fulsome, focused and specific – Verbal formulae and conclusory assertions not sufficient – Necessity for evidence to be adequate and compelling – Necessity for evidence to address the purpose for which documents were created or communications were made – Whether discretion should be exercised in favour of inspection of the documents over which privilege was claimed Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Health Services Act 1997 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ampolex Ltd v Perpetual Trustee Co (Canberra) Ltd (1996) 40 NSWLR 12 Asahi Holdings (Australia) Pty Ltd v Pacific Equity Parties Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 998 ASIC v Rich [2004] NSWSC 1089 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Lux Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 89 Bailey v Department of Land and Water Conservation (2009) 74 NSWLR 333; [2009] NSWCA 100 Barnes v Commissioner of Taxation [2007] FCAFC 88; 242 ALR 601 Bennett v Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Customs Service (2004) 140 FCR 101; [2004] FCAFC 237 Compagnie Financiere et Commerciale du Pacifique v Peruvian Guano Co (1882) 52 LJQB 181 Con Ange v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1200 Dingwall v Commonwealth of Australia (1992) 39 FCR 521; [1992] FCA 627 Ensham Resources Pty Ltd v AIOI Insurance Co Ltd (2012) 209 FCR 1; [2012] FCAFC 191 Esso Australia Resources Ltd v FCT (1999) 201 CLR 49; [1999] HCA 67 Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd v Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 303; [2013] HCA 46 Graphite Energy Pty Ltd v Lloyd Energy Systems Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1326 Harman v Home Department State Secretary [1983] 1 AC 280; [1982] 2 WLR 338 Hutchinson v Glover (1875) 1 QBD 138 In the matter of Felan's Fisheries Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1262 Kennedy v Wallace (2004) 142 FCR 185; [2004] FCAFC 337 Mulley v Manifold (1959) 103 CLR 341; [1959] HCA 23 National Crime Authority v S (1991) 29 FCR 203; [1991] FCA 234 New South Wales v Jackson [2007] NSWCA 279 Palavi v Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 264 R v Rogerson; R v McNamara (No 31) [2016] NSWSC 195 Re Colorado Products Pty Ltd (in prov liq) [2013] NSWSC 611 Schlam v WA Trustee Executor & Agency Co Ltd [1964] WAR 178 Singapore Airlines v Sydney Airports Corporation [2004] NSWSC 380 Sparnon v Apand Pty Ltd (1996) 68 FCR 322 Tirango Nominees Pty Ltd v Dairy Vale Foods Pty Ltd (1998) 156 ALR 364 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Hunter New England Local Health District (Plaintiff) Munters Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Gow (Plaintiff) B Docker (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate