NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Larden v Health Care Complaints Commission [2018] NSWCATOD 85 Hearing dates: 4 April 2018 Date of orders: 04 June 2018 Decision date: 04 June 2018 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: R Titterton, Principal Member D North, Senior Member V Murdoch, Senior Member J Houen, General Member Decision: 1. The application for reinstatement is dismissed. 2. The applicant to pay the respondent's costs, as agreed or as assessed. Catchwords: TRADES AND PROFESSION –– Pharmacy –– Health Practitioner Regulation National Law –– reinstatement order –– principles to be applied Legislation Cited: Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Regulation 2002 Cases Cited: Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; Health Care Complaints Commission v Shah [2013] NSWNT 1 Health Care Complaints Commission v Shah [2013] NSWNMT 1 In Re Jason Martin [2010] NSWMT 13 Scully v Health Care Complaints Commission [2013] NSWNMT Shah v Health Care Complaints Commission [2016] NSWCATOD 68. Shah v Health Care Complaints Commission [2014] NSWCATOD 94 Wang v Health Care Complaints Commission [2018] NSWCATOD 34 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dr Dale Larden, Applicant Health Care Complaints Commission, Respondent Representation: Solicitors:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate