NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Dunn v R [2018] NSWCCA 108 Hearing dates: 28 May 2018 Decision date: 04 June 2018 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Johnson J at [2]; Adamson J at [3] Decision: Leave to appeal refused. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal – sentence – single ground of appeal that parity principles apply where offender sentenced for offence which is taken into account on Form 1 for co-offenders – parity principles inapplicable – no justifiable sense of grievance – prosecutor's discretion to include charges on Form 1 not reviewable Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 9, 32, 33 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Regulation 2010 (NSW) cl 4(1) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 5(1)(c) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) ss 25(1), 25A(1) Cases Cited: Abbas v R [2013] NSWCCA 115; (2013) 231 A Crim R 413 Attorney-General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146; [2002] NSWCCA 518 Elias v The Queen; Issa v The Queen (2013) 248 CLR 483; [2013] HCA 31 Gaggioli v R [2014] NSWCCA 246 Gordon v R [2018] NSWCCA 54 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Nguyen, Kathy v R [2015] NSWCCA 209 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gary Paul Bruce Dunn (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: H Cox (Applicant) E Balodis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate