NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Henkelman v Psychology Council of New South Wales (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 818 Hearing dates: 31 May 2018 Date of orders: 31 May 2018 Decision date: 31 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt J Decision: (1) The application is dismissed; and (2) Mr Henkelman is to bear the Council's costs as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – application for dismissal for want of due despatch – where plaintiff does not appear – application granted – proceedings dismissed Legislation Cited: Civil Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (2013) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Henkelman v Psychology Council of Australia [2017] NSWCATOD 161 Henkelman v Psychology Council of Australia (Supreme Court (NSW), Fagan J, 22 March 2018, unrep) Henkelman v Psychology Council of Australia [2018] NSWSC 800 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Steven Michael Henkelman (Plaintiff) Psychology Council of New South Wales (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Benson (Defendant) Solicitors: Mr S Henkelman, unrepresented (Plaintiff) Health Professional Councils Authority (Defendant) File Number(s): 2017/372496 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: NCAT Citation: [2017] NSWCATOD 161 Date of Decision: 8 November 2017 Before: R C Titterton, Principal Member File Number(s): NCAT 2017/66101
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate