NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Sydney Cosmetic Specialist Clinic Pty Ltd v Hu (No 3) [2018] NSWSC 823 Hearing dates: 11 May 2018 Decision date: 11 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Leave granted to plaintiff pursuant to s 65(2)(b) of the Civil Procedure Act to correct the name of the fourth defendant to Qiong Yan; leave granted to plaintiff to file the proposed amended statement of claim served yesterday and, to the extent necessary, grant leave in that respect pursuant to section 65(2)(c) of the Civil Procedure Act, reserving the defendants' right to object to the form of that pleading. Catchwords: DEFAMATION – pleading – application to amend name of defendant – where plaintiff had difficulty identifying the user of a particular WeChat identifier Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 65(2)(b), 65(2)(c) Cases Cited: Bridge Shipping Pty Ltd v Grand Shipping SA (1991) 173 CLR 231; [1991] HCA 45 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: The Sydney Cosmetic Specialist Clinic Pty Ltd (first plaintiff) Dr Siew Yi Lee (second plaintiff) Richard Hu ("Yiwen Hu") (first defendant) Valgrow 1 Pty Ltd (trading as LJ Hooker Burwood) (second defendant) Lijue Ma (third defendant) Qiong Yan (fourth defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Spies (plaintiffs) First defendant self-represented W Bure (solicitor for the second defendant) O Jones (third defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate