NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Blackett [2018] NSWCCA 114 Hearing dates: 18, 30 May 2018 Date of orders: 07 June 2018 Decision date: 07 June 2018 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Button J at [57]; Fagan J at [58] Decision: 1. Appeal allowed. 2. Set aside the stay ordered by the District Court on 1 March 2018. 3. Remit the proceedings to the District Court for determination in accordance with law. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – procedure – permanent stay – stay granted by court below on basis of weakness of Crown case – whether primary judge had applied correct test – whether "incurable weakness" in Crown case such that prosecution was "foredoomed to fail" – consideration of exceptional nature of jurisdiction – appeal allowed, stay discharged and matter remitted to District Court for trial Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61A, 61E, 66C, 78 Crimes Amendment (Sexual Offences) Act 2003 (NSW), Schedule 1 item 9 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 141, 142 Cases Cited: Agius v The Queen; Abibadra v The Queen; Jandagi v The Queen; Zerafa v The Queen (2011) 80 NSWLR 486; [2011] NSWCCA 119 Barton v The Queen (1980) 147 CLR 75; [1980] HCA 48 Director of Public Prosecutions (SA) v B (1998) 194 CLR 566; [1998] HCA 45 Kennedy v R [2017] NSWCCA 193 Little (a pseudonym) v R (2015) 44 VR 816; [2015] VSCA 62 Magaming v The Queen (2013) 252 CLR 381; [2013] HCA 40 R v Crawley [2014] EWCA Crim 1028 R v Edwards [2009] HCA 20; 83 ALJR 717 R v Jasper [2003] NSWCCA 186; 139 A Crim R 329 R v McGee (2008) 102 SASR 318; [2008] SASC 328 R v Moore (2015) 91 NSWLR 276; [2015] NSWCCA 316 R v Smith [1995] 1 VR 10 Saraswati v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 1; [1991] HCA 21 TS v R [2014] NSWCCA 174 Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378; [1993] HCA 77 Texts Cited: A Choo, Abuse of Process and Judicial Stays of Criminal Proceedings (2nd ed, 2008, Clarendon Press) D Ormerod and D Perry (eds), Blackstone's Criminal Practice 2017 (Oxford University Press) C Corns, "Judicial Termination of Defective Criminal Prosecutions: Stay Applications" (1997) 16 University of Tasmania Law Review 75 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Appellant) Brent Blackett (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: B Baker (Crown) S Hall (18 May), S Goodwin (30 May) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate