NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: ZA v R [2018] NSWCCA 116 Hearing dates: 28 May 2018 Decision date: 08 June 2018 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Johnson J at [2]; Adamson J at [3] Decision: Extension of time to appeal against conviction and to apply for leave to appeal against sentence refused. Catchwords: CRIME – conviction appeal – father arranged for his 12-year old daughter to marry – whether procured a child for unlawful sexual activity
WORDS AND PHRASES – meaning of the word "procure" in s 66EB of Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – importance of context when considering meaning
CRIME – application for leave to appeal against sentence – assessment of objective seriousness as "very serious" open to sentencing judge – motive for offence was father's religious belief – not an ameliorating factor – no error in judge's sentencing process
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time – advice received that no merit in appeal against conviction or application for leave to appeal against sentence – further advice obtained substantially later – extension of time to appeal against conviction and to apply for leave to appeal against sentence refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 66C(1), 66EB(2)(a), 82, 83, 84, 91A, 91B, 91G, 321, 346, 351A, 351B Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) s 56 Crimes Amendment (Sexual Offences) Act 2008 (NSW) Crimes Amendment (Sexual Procurement or Grooming of Children) Act 2007 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 6 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) s 133 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 18 Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) s 33 Marriage Act 1961 (Cth) s 11 Cases Cited: Clarkson v R; EJA v R (2011) 32 VR 361; [2011] VSCA 157 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Filippou v The Queen (2015) 256 CLR 47; [2015] HCA 29 Fleming v The Queen (1998) 197 CLR 250; [1998] HCA 68 R v Gavel [2014] NSWCCA 56; (2014) 239 A Crim R 469 Giorgianni v The Queen (1985) 156 CLR 473; [1985] HCA 29 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; [1994] HCA 63 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 R v Broadfoot [1976] 3 All ER 753 R v Hillier (2007) 228 CLR 618; [2007] HCA 13 R v Nelson [2016] NSWCCA 130 R v Russell [1933] VLR 59 Regina v Castiglione [1963] SR (NSW) 393 Regina v Pikos [1967] VR 89 The Queen v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308; [2016] HCA 35 Truong v The Queen (2004) 223 CLR 122; [2004] HCA 10 Texts Cited: New South Wales Legislative Assembly, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 7 November 2007 United Nations, Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989 Category: Principal judgment Parties: ZA (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Trevallion (Applicant) B Hatfield (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate