NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Parslow v NSW Land & Housing Corporation; NSW Land & Housing Corporation v Parslow [2018] NSWSC 843 Hearing dates: 16, 17, 18, 19 April 2018; further written submissions ending 15 May 2018 Date of orders: 07 June 2018 Decision date: 07 June 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Parker J Decision: As at [211] and [212] Catchwords: EVIDENCE – admissibility – hearsay evidence – business records exception under s 69 of Act – Ombudsman's report recording what Ombudsman was told during interview – whether fact or opinion – whether evidence of fact
EQUITY – estoppel – estoppel in pais – common assumption of fact – whether representation was based on an existing fact or promissory in nature
EQUITY - laches – prejudice suffered by the defendant as a result of the passage of time – plaintiff's acquiescence to violation of rights
REAL PROPERTY – estoppel allegedly arising out of prior owner's conduct - indefeasibility
EQUITY – equitable estoppel – whether conduct amounted to representation of lifetime tenancy – whether renovation works undertaken in reliance on belief of lifetime tenancy – rent charged at less than market value – alternative public housing tenancy offered – whether detriment suffered in the relevant sense Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 69, 78 Housing Act 1985 Limitation Act 1969, s 27(2) Real Property Act 1900, s 42 Residential Tenancies Act 2010, s 154G Cases Cited: Bahr v Nicolay Bahr v Nicolay [1987] HCA 32; (1987) 163 CLR 490 CSR Ltd v Amaca Pty Ltd [2016] VSCA 320 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 22; (2007) 230 CLR 89 Lithgow City Council v Jackson [2011] HCA 36; (2011) 244 CLR 352 Milling v Hardie [2014] NSWCA 163 Orr v Ford [1989] HCA 4; (1989) 167 CLR 316 PW & Co v Milton Gate Investments Ltd [2004] Ch 142 Texts Cited: Handley, Estoppel by Conduct and Election (2nd Ed, 2016) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sally May Parslow (Plaintiff in 2017/112924; Defendant in 2018/123505) NSW Land & Housing Corporation (Defendant in 2017/112924; Plaintiff in 2018/123505) Representation: Counsel: RD Wilson SC/K Tang (Plaintiff in 2017/112924; Defendant in 2018/123505) J O'Connor/N Simpson (Defendant in 2017/112924; Plaintiff in 2018/123505)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate